New Signatures - Printable Version +- Wroaw's Way Wicked Board (http://board.wroaw.com) +-- Forum: General (/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Chit-Chat lair (/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: New Signatures (/thread-2218.html) |
New Signatures - JessicaT - 10-27-2007 03:44 AM Ok. Which one is better. I made them btw. I dont know which one too pick. They both look good. Number 1: Number 2: New Signatures - The Senate - 10-27-2007 03:53 AM First one looks like someone pissed on it. Second one looks washed out. New Signatures - Dwopple - 10-27-2007 04:52 AM Both suck, SPIDERMAN SUCKs, especially the 3rd movie ;D New Signatures - Womb-Raider - 10-27-2007 05:02 AM I liked the spiderman movies but those sigs suck :/ New Signatures - G3n0C1D3 - 10-27-2007 05:05 AM The first one seems overcontrasted (There's a bit of grainy texture near the left) Bottom one's's lighting is WAY too bright and strong. New Signatures - sleepy-sheep - 10-27-2007 08:04 AM cut down on the lighting on the second one, it kills the writing. also try and pick a better font that matches the render, imo it doesnt seem to fit. first one has too many effects on it, so it loses its quality. New Signatures - coca - 10-27-2007 12:53 PM Dwopple,Oct 26 2007, 06:52 PM Wrote:Both suck, SPIDERMAN SUCKs, especially the 3rd movie ;DTru. Only the first Spiderman movie was cool>!!>!> I agree with sheep, the 2nd one is the best but the lighting in the topleft corner is too intense Great work though:) New Signatures - Underdog - 10-27-2007 01:12 PM ...I guess I'm the only one that likes the first one better.... must be a maturity thing.... New Signatures - JessicaT - 10-27-2007 08:53 PM Well i liked the second one at first. But everyone kept saying they liked the first one. :o New Signatures - Spitfire! - 10-27-2007 09:03 PM I cant pick which one I prefer, but you should try out some non-default fonts on 'em. I make album covers for an online game I play and I get all my fonts from http://www.dafont.com/:) also you should try messing around with photoshop brushes:D |